|
LeetFruitBoy
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: February 09, 2011, 08:45:43 PM » |
|
There are now official rules.
Go us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Place is dead it seems. I miss you early 2011 community. I miss you so much.  Feel Free to Call me Jarred or just LFB. Proud member from day 1.
|
|
|
electric_shaman
Level 2
 
Posts: 223
Bacon Aficionado
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: February 10, 2011, 10:06:46 AM » |
|
There are now official rules.
Go us.
I know right. It feels all democratic up in here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
juxtapose519
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: February 10, 2011, 11:09:23 AM » |
|
There are now official rules.
Go us.
I know right. It feels all democratic up in here. Does that make us the founding fathers of meat? Thomas Jeffersausage, Beefjamin Frankfurter and George Porkchopington?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kyle
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: February 10, 2011, 06:08:19 PM » |
|
I've added psychopath as a mod. If he actually turns out to be a psychopath then we're all in trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Psychopath
Global Moderator
Level 3
    
Posts: 398
Friendly neighborhood psychopath
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: February 10, 2011, 06:17:14 PM » |
|
But I am only global moderator with merely global moderation power, if it were administrative administrator power, then there would be a potential threat to your turf, Mr. Macho Man 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shamelessly promoting the game he works on through his avatar since 2009
|
|
|
|
kyle
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: February 10, 2011, 06:18:50 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
electric_shaman
Level 2
 
Posts: 223
Bacon Aficionado
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: February 10, 2011, 06:28:02 PM » |
|
Rule 1 needs amending, to add something about attacking beliefs.
To clarify, debate is fine, but to outright say "Your belief is silly and stupid because mine is the opposite", I feel, shouldn't be allowed.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 10, 2011, 06:32:18 PM by electric_shaman »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stevolutionary
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: February 10, 2011, 06:34:59 PM » |
|
Rule 1 needs amending, to add something about attacking beliefs.
To clarify, debate is fine, but to outright say "Your belief is silly and stupid because mine is the opposite", I feel, shouldn't be allowed.
Let's also amend the constitution to disallow free speech. I'd wager a lot of money that if I was promoting say Islamic fundamentalism, you'd feel the opposite. Translation - "saying things that conflict with my worldview shouldn't be allowed"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
electric_shaman
Level 2
 
Posts: 223
Bacon Aficionado
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: February 10, 2011, 07:43:27 PM » |
|
Let's also amend the constitution to disallow free speech. I'd wager a lot of money that if I was promoting say Islamic fundamentalism, you'd feel the opposite.
Translation - "saying things that conflict with my worldview shouldn't be allowed"
Clearly, free speech is not truly allowed. If it were, we'd have trolls running rampants spewing racial slurs and causing general disorder. It's allowed within reason. What you are promoting is of no interest to me, it is the manner in which you promote it. It is not respectful or decent to call someone else's view stupid or arrogant. edit: If beliefs are ignorant, bigoted and taking the world backwards, then I have every right to attack them That is why I would like the rule added. There should be no circumstance under which another person's beliefs can be attacked.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 10, 2011, 07:48:50 PM by electric_shaman »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stevolutionary
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: February 10, 2011, 10:16:10 PM » |
|
Let's also amend the constitution to disallow free speech. I'd wager a lot of money that if I was promoting say Islamic fundamentalism, you'd feel the opposite.
Translation - "saying things that conflict with my worldview shouldn't be allowed"
Clearly, free speech is not truly allowed. If it were, we'd have trolls running rampants spewing racial slurs and causing general disorder. It's allowed within reason. What you are promoting is of no interest to me, it is the manner in which you promote it. It is not respectful or decent to call someone else's view stupid or arrogant. edit: If beliefs are ignorant, bigoted and taking the world backwards, then I have every right to attack them That is why I would like the rule added. There should be no circumstance under which another person's beliefs can be attacked. Then there should not be section of the forum dedicated to anything other than games, as any discussion about politics, sexuality, war or religion will have no merit. If you're a grown up you can handle having your views challenged or even rubbished. About the absolute limit of 'insults' was the labelling of people's views as arrogant or stupid. Not actually calling the poster that, just remarking, in their opinion, that such a belief system was rooted in personal naivety or arrogance on an intellectual level. There's a difference there, and pussyfooting around that or sugarcoating it makes the arguments toothless. But if it's inflaming passions, then I won't continue to post like that.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 10, 2011, 10:20:25 PM by Stevolutionary »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LeetFruitBoy
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: February 10, 2011, 11:15:08 PM » |
|
Yay official rules.
The ones we have are fine and most importantly The Silent Protagonist is gone.
Go Kyle and Orci <3
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Place is dead it seems. I miss you early 2011 community. I miss you so much.  Feel Free to Call me Jarred or just LFB. Proud member from day 1.
|
|
|
|
Stevolutionary
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: February 11, 2011, 01:05:44 AM » |
|
Yay official rules.
The ones we have are fine and most importantly The Silent Protagonist is gone.
Go Kyle and Orci <3
I agree. I may have irked people by attacking their views, but I still remain respectful to the poster as an individual. He however seemed to me to be the only genuinely bad natured poster here, regularly calling people fags, etc. Glad he's gone if so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
juxtapose519
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: February 11, 2011, 06:22:58 AM » |
|
There's a big difference between disagreeing with someone's views and expressing a different opinion, and outright attacking them.
I think this community is mature enough that we can discuss and disagree in a respectful mannor without getting into the "attack" territory. In the event that it ever does happen, the rules are already broad enough that we can warn the offenders first and then take further action if it doesn't stop. I think what we've got all the bases covered.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 11, 2011, 06:28:47 AM by juxtapose519 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Maruhai
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: February 11, 2011, 11:21:00 AM » |
|
I've added psychopath as a mod. If he actually turns out to be a psychopath then we're all in trouble.
Worst idea you ever had and you will ever have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LeetFruitBoy
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: February 11, 2011, 11:28:48 AM » |
|
Glad to see a mod team is shaping form <3
Also kyle can you add usergroups? Cause my idea for a level design team was pretty well supported, and i'd definitely like to lead it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Place is dead it seems. I miss you early 2011 community. I miss you so much.  Feel Free to Call me Jarred or just LFB. Proud member from day 1.
|
|
|
|