Nicco
Level 1

Posts: 112
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: February 07, 2011, 12:43:37 PM » |
|
I'm sorry shootakai.   You can blame McJones because he made me enraged. Though I have to admit that you have some pretty sweet times on certain levels. E: I should have mentioned my old time was 4.94. I improved it to 4.74, but the leaderboard didn't update it properly. A few tries later and I got 4.62 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 07, 2011, 12:46:12 PM by Nicco »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Drandor
Level 0
Posts: 55
"It's nice to meat you"
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: February 07, 2011, 02:15:43 PM » |
|
You guys peaked my curiosity on 2-5X after such discussion about it. So, I want ahead and got this:  Only took about 20 minutes 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stokes
Level 0
Posts: 59
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: February 07, 2011, 03:13:09 PM » |
|
Probably the 4th best time at .85 seconds for 1-3 The Gap, not counting all the hacked and shady times.
Tied for 4th with 1.15 seconds for 5-16 Rotgut.
99th including the hacked/shady times in 7-5 Tommunism with 7.32 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
73L
Level 0
Posts: 44
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: February 07, 2011, 05:23:07 PM » |
|
Finally claim first for Grape Soda.  
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FlipTaco
Level 2
 
Posts: 253
Black belt in vegetable & condiment housing
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: February 07, 2011, 05:51:50 PM » |
|
Aside from my #12 (now #13 D:), I just got another rank I'm rather proud of. I think I nearly had an aneurysm from raging but I've finally got a great run on 7-5x, getting me #44  
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McJones
Level 0
Posts: 43
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: February 07, 2011, 08:26:11 PM » |
|
You guys peaked my curiosity on 2-5X after such discussion about it. So, I want ahead and got this:  Only took about 20 minutes  Nice, I sure didn't hold that record long. But you have not seen the last of me! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sh00takai
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: February 07, 2011, 09:45:00 PM » |
|
You can blame McJones because he made me enraged. Though I have to admit that you have some pretty sweet times on certain levels.
Haha, it's nothing. It's fun to get excited about improving a single level's record to the max. There always seems to be a small space for further improvements. 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 07, 2011, 09:47:20 PM by sh00takai »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stevolutionary
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2011, 12:44:05 AM » |
|
You can blame McJones because he made me enraged. Though I have to admit that you have some pretty sweet times on certain levels.
Haha, it's nothing. It's fun to get excited about improving a single level's record to the max. There always seems to be a small space for further improvements.  Just out of interest, could any of you PC guys put up a screen cap of the PC times for 7-19X? I'm interested in how I stack up as i'm number 1 on the 360 version (actually 2nd, but 1st is hacked...) and i'd be interested if anyone's beat my time of 15.46.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sh00takai
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: February 08, 2011, 01:35:30 AM » |
|
Just out of interest, could any of you PC guys put up a screen cap of the PC times for 7-19X?
I'm interested in how I stack up as i'm number 1 on the 360 version (actually 2nd, but 1st is hacked...) and i'd be interested if anyone's beat my time of 15.46.
I could do it, but I'm at work now and it will take ~9-10 hours before I'm free. If someone can post it before that, feel free to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nicco
Level 1

Posts: 112
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2011, 02:08:40 AM » |
|
You can blame McJones because he made me enraged. Though I have to admit that you have some pretty sweet times on certain levels.
Haha, it's nothing. It's fun to get excited about improving a single level's record to the max. There always seems to be a small space for further improvements.  Just out of interest, could any of you PC guys put up a screen cap of the PC times for 7-19X? I'm interested in how I stack up as i'm number 1 on the 360 version (actually 2nd, but 1st is hacked...) and i'd be interested if anyone's beat my time of 15.46.  No idea if the time for rank 32 is legit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stevolutionary
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2011, 02:21:17 AM » |
|
Thanks Nicco and sh00takai!
I'd argue 32 isn't legit. I may be kidding myself just to keep my number 1 spot, but the guy above me on the 360 is only 0.12 above me, and even that seems a stretch (and he's been banned), so 3/4 second seems impossible.
On most levels you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between such a small amount of time, but this one is unique in that the wall dictates your completion time, so if you reach Meat Boy exactyl as the wall collapses as I did (passing through while the wall graphic is still shrinking) it's literally impossible to improve in anything other than hundredths of seconds (as all the nearby times show - i'm only first by 0.01 second...)
Damn hackers! They could at least have the decency to post clearly impossible times and not make us doubt ourselves!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 02:23:49 AM by Stevolutionary »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sh00takai
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2011, 10:18:41 AM » |
|
Thanks Nicco and sh00takai!
I'd argue 32 isn't legit. I may be kidding myself just to keep my number 1 spot, but the guy above me on the 360 is only 0.12 above me, and even that seems a stretch (and he's been banned), so 3/4 second seems impossible.
On most levels you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between such a small amount of time, but this one is unique in that the wall dictates your completion time, so if you reach Meat Boy exactyl as the wall collapses as I did (passing through while the wall graphic is still shrinking) it's literally impossible to improve in anything other than hundredths of seconds (as all the nearby times show - i'm only first by 0.01 second...)
Damn hackers! They could at least have the decency to post clearly impossible times and not make us doubt ourselves!
I'm getting closer to your time, but man, the last part demands an insanely accurate timing. It's a very nice challenge! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TunnelingEffect
Level 2
 
Posts: 287
Goodbye
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: February 08, 2011, 11:56:49 AM » |
|
I'm second on 2-1 Biohazard. I'm skeptical about the guy above me, shaving off a full .20, it took being pitch perfect just to get my time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Hello
|
|
|
McJones
Level 0
Posts: 43
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: February 08, 2011, 12:01:40 PM » |
|
I hate the fact that we have to speculate on whether or not a time is legitimate, but I guess there's really no way to stop all cheating.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sh00takai
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: February 08, 2011, 12:31:30 PM » |
|
Aside from my #12 (now #13 D:), I just got another rank I'm rather proud of. I think I nearly had an aneurysm from raging but I've finally got a great run on 7-5x, getting me #44   I died so many times to get this record, but I think it can still be improved by a few hundreths of a seconds. I found one trick pretty effective to get that gap of 0.08 seconds. While jumping to get the first key, do not fall to the platform but wall jump immediately back. I'm second on 2-1 Biohazard. I'm skeptical about the guy above me, shaving off a full .20, it took being pitch perfect just to get my time. I hate the fact that we have to speculate on whether or not a time is legitimate, but I guess there's really no way to stop all cheating.
I agree, it's a bit frustrating when you can't tell whether the times next to you are glitched or not. I hope Team Meat comes up with a solution at some point. If there comes some great fixes in the future, I wouldn't mind if they reset the whole leaderboards if you only needed to play through the levels once again to upload the correct times from your local saves.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 01:38:02 PM by sh00takai »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|